MiscCategory

Hello

In category:Misc

Hi, I'm LoS. Found this site's archive after a post that got the owner banned from twitter. Asked to join & he gave me an account.

Seems like a quiet place to vent. And vent I shall.

Post by:Left on Sunday

Insult is Back

In category:Misc

That's right, you unintelligent clumps of meat: We are back.

We are back and we are stronger than before. Okay, maybe not really stronger than before but the key point remains that we are back.

Post by:CentauR

Untitled

In category:Misc

Two fireman are buttfucking in a smoke filled room

Post by:DaBean

An Unbeatable Argument For Taking Peoples’ Guns Away

In category:Misc

Welcome, potential person who has some skin in the gun control game (one way or the other).

Let me possibly confuse you, first thing: I don't want to take anyone's guns away.

Now let me clear that up: You get more views of your content via "shocking" or otherwise manipulative headlines. If that causes you some indignation (as opposed to other sites doing it and just not telling you) then I apologize and I won't be upset if you stop reading.

This is mainly about mental health. Before you go making assumptions, I realize that there are plenty of people on both sides of the issue who realize that mental health is a very important topic, and that they actually act on it. I also realize that there are plenty of people on both sides of the issue who proclaim they think it's an important topic but are really just dodging since they are the first to decry mental illness when it "helps" the perpetrator of something like a mass shooting avoid the death penalty.

My sister suffers from mental illness. I care for her greatly, even though I've seen her say and do some incredibly terrible things to other family members - and even to me a few times, whereas I'm usually able to talk her down - and every time she goes through a bad period I always find myself upset at how little is done for her by the people who are supposed to help her: mental health professionals won't take her in as a patient, the ones who do only listen to her for 15 minutes and then give her some drugs, the hospitals' concern only extends as far payment does, and the police only care that she isn't harming anyone if they even respond to calls from/about her. She is unable to hold a job due to her illness so she has to receive assistance from the state. My parents help her out when they can, as well, but my family is middle class: there's little to offer. All that wraps up to be a dire situation and when my sister tells me she's feeling depressed I can understand.

James Holmes
The face of an "evil" person?

The point is, the help isn't there for the majority of people. Even for those with the resources it sometimes isn't there. This is mainly because people either refuse to or don't understand what it means to be mentally ill. My example above about the mass shooting illustrates the point perfectly: most people still think that "evil" motivates an Adam Lanza into a mass shooting, as if he rationally sat down and told himself about what he was going to do. This, of course, is asinine - by its very definition those actions defy rationality.

Now, the crux of all my exposition on this topic is not to discredit gun control legislation. I am not a fan of banning things because it ultimately doesn't solve the problem but I certainly understand the argument: without access to the guns (especially in Lanza's case) there's most likely no violence - and I know that other countries have seen positive results from legislation. However, the real problem is getting the right help for people who need it so that someone like James Holmes doesn't even find himself in a position to "rationalize" killing people. The lobby against gun control is so powerful, as well, that politicians lose their seats as a result of even small attempts to legislate. Of course that isn't a reason to give up or move on, but imagine if mental illness got the same amount of power behind it that gun control has. People like my sister might be able to see a doctor instead of being turned away simply because she is a ward of the state. She wouldn't have to be placed into a hospital and discharged a short while afterward when she still isn't okay. The police would know not to patronize her or, if she does something worthy of an arrest, they would know to handle it gracefully. It would mean that the people who have previously felt there were no paths besides a Columbine/Tucson/Washington Naval Yard/Mission Valley mall would have support and, with any luck, lessen those types of atrocities.

If you're pro-gun and thinking I'm on your side, think again. As I stated above, I don't believe we should be outright banning guns. However, I doubt the candor any of the protestations given by the NRA and other supporters, though. Two, off the top of my head: 1) "Criminals don't care about the law," and 2) "What about gang violence?" They are, on the surface, decent things to bring up. Per my examples, a person who is going to commit a crime doesn't care if using a gun is outlawed and gang violence is still a very big concern - but here's my problem with that reasoning: Those things have nothing to do with the link between guns and mental health and as a result, you sound both uninformed and insensitive. Uninformed because a mass shooter isn't a criminal holding up a convenience store at gunpoint or a gang member for the very reasons I listed in the first part. Insensitive because those protestations only come off as red herrings, and they aren't consolations for people who lost loved ones; rather, they seem as attacks. Think about it - in reworked language, you're basically saying, "This material thing [the gun] is more important to me than the fact that you lost someone." (I get that it's about much more than the object.) The same query I posed earlier applies to the gun owners: Think about what would happen if the energy spent on those protestations and lobbying against gun control was spent on advocating for the mentally ill.

Both sides of the issue, in their hectic dance, overlook the importance of the killer - the root problem that needs to be solved. If your gut reaction to these terrible events is contempt for the perpetrator, or to immediately pull out the second amendment, or to immediately begin crowing about laws to get rid of certain types of guns then I don't think you are focusing your energy constructively. Like any other kind of social issue in this country it comes down to exposure and awareness. If you're interested in learning more there are a myriad of resources to look at - a simple Google search for "mental illness awareness" alone will turn up many good ones. If you are one of those folks who needs things to be shared to you, a good start is the NAMI website.

If nothing else, I hope that my words have caused you to think. Perhaps, if you are all too familiar with the struggles of mental illness - be it you or someone you love suffering - you'll share your story.

Post by:Calliander

The Taliban are Irrelevant

In category:Misc

The Taliban are a bunch of irrelevant little babies. To prove that point, they made their #1 enemy a 14 year-old girl and then shot her.

They went after a 14 year-old girl. I mean, how useless is your organization that you're going after a 14 year-old girl?

Then they attacked and shot her. So not only are they a pointless group of thoughtless troglodytes, but they are also a bunch of cowards! They probably have small genitalia, too. I mean, you'd have to be insufficient in the "manhood" area to demonize a 14 year-old girl, let alone go through with the whole process of harming her (and they had the intent to kill).

I hope this little girl gets better soon, because you know what she's going to do as soon as she can speak? She's going to forgive them. She's going to explain that while it was a terrible experience, she's not going to spread any more hatred.

And that's what being an adult, a human, and a responsible member of this global society is all about.

The Taliban. LOL.

Post by:Calliander

BARCELONETA

In category:Misc
Missing image: /wp-content/uploads/2012/04/photo5.jpg

Insane.

St00n

Post by:Stone

Apologies

In category:Misc

Wait... so Sandra Fluke isn't a slut?

...

Guess I'll stop sending her hookup emails.

Post by:Calliander

Happy Holidays

In category:Misc

Merry Christmas!

Also, welcome back NBA!

Missing image: http://cdnmo.coveritlive.com/media/image/201102/phpMWmthz30623221.gif

St00n

Post by:Stone

Volcano Fists

In category:Misc

Yo - if you see this, would you send me your home address?

St00n

Post by:Stone

Nerdy punk rock shit

In category:Misc

One of my buddies from outside the core group is a musician and his band is going to make a new record after 10 years. Gunwalls and Stone may know him, too. Anyway, his band is named 88mph, which is pretty badass unless you don't like Back to the Future (in which case you are an extreme douche nozzle). They have a Kickstarter project. Check it out and stuff - no obligation, it would just be cool to raise a ton of money for them. They're pretty much punk rock. They have a Bandcamp page, too, with some old ass songs.

Post by:Calliander

Enormous Green Rage Monster

In category:Misc

Aw shit, the Avengers trailer looks awesome.

1% of taxpayers pay about 40% of income taxes - ok. However, that same top 1% takes home 25% of all income generated by everyone in the country - important thing to remember.

However, that doesn't really explain enough.

Every person in the US needs a certain amount of income to pay for necessities - food, shelter, and the flat taxes (payroll, FICA, sales) that we all pay. Let's call that amount $30k per tax return - and that might not be enough.

It's only income in excess of that number that we could possibly consider taking income tax from, right? People making less than $30k/yr don't have anything left over - there's nothing to tax.

If you look only at income in excess of $30k/return - the necessities people need to get by - then the top 1% of all taxpayers (people making around $250k+) actually takes in 50% of all income beyond the necessities. 50%!

Knowing that - that taxpayers making over $250k/yr have access to 50% of all beyond-necessities income - makes the fact that that group pays 40% of all income taxes seem at least fair. In fact, it seems to clearly indicate that if having a functioning government is worthwhile, that the wealthiest Americans can afford to put up a bit more. I wish all of the Occupy Wall Street people understood this.

St00n

Post by:Stone

STOOOOON 2000!!!!

In category:Misc

Go private and take a look at what's been posted!

Post by:LioConvoy

Not Kanye

In category:Misc

19 - 30

How about this?

Also fuck where you work.

St00n

Post by:Stone

Needless Provocation

In category:Misc

Who wants to hunt a yellow dragon? Me running D&D 3rd Ed in Branford, Saturday August 27, all day. We will need to make characters over the internet - over gmail chat or something - in advance.

Mike - have you listened to Runaway, Monster, Otis, That's My Bitch, virtually any of the stuff that Kanye's produced on Watch The Throne or My Dark Twisted Fantasy? The production is great.

ST00n

Post by:Stone

=

In category:Misc
Missing image: /wp-content/uploads/2011/06/06-poster12_900.jpg
Post by:Stone
© 1997-2024 by Insult.org.